Incorporating a smoke control system in the design stage of a building
significantly improves safety. Smoke Control systems come in many forms
but their basic objectives are the same; keeping escape and access
routes free of smoke, facilitating fire fighting operations by creating
a smoke free layer, protecting a building’s contents and reducing
structural damage.
These systems are increasingly used to
protect structures including multi-storey residential and public
buildings, under croft car parks, shopping centres, warehouses and
factories.
In apartment buildings there is a legal requirement
to protect the common escape routes to enable residents to escape in
the event of a fire, and to assist fire fighters needing to enter the
building to deal with an incident. Statistics show that there are over
50,000 fires in dwellings in the UK annually and more than 300
fatalities, most of which are caused by the effects of smoke inhalation.
The
latest edition of Approved Document B: Fire safety (ADB) to the
Building Regulations in England and Wales, which came into effect in
April 2007, sets out basic fire safety requirements and provides
guidance on satisfying these requirements in the most common building
situations. It provides detailed methods of complying with regulations
with regard to smoke control in apartment buildings in particular,
covering natural ventilation through AOVs, natural ventilation through
smoke shafts and pressurisation. The relative responsibilities of
builders, designers and owners of buildings are set out in the
Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, and the Construction
(Design and Management) Regulations 2006.
I have been
concerned for some time about the trend in the industry for smoke
control systems to be ‘over-engineered’ and in some cases unnecessarily
costly and cumbersome, leading to time delays and budget issues. There
is a growing trend towards proposing fire-engineered solutions,
particularly mechanical extract, which fall outside the scope of the
approved documents and are designed specifically for the building. We
believe that such solutions can be useful for complex buildings but are
inappropriate for simple apartment buildings where the additional cost,
time and risk entailed in designing a novel system do not justify any
relatively minor benefits in terms of space saved.
Furthermore the
proposal of specially engineered solutions puts additional pressure on
approving authorities to approve complex systems when they may not have
the expertise to fully understand the finite details of such designs.
My
many years’ experience has taught me that blocks of flats are
essentially similar. Whilst fire engineering has a valuable
contribution to make in complex buildings, for the average apartment
building it doesn’t make sense to use a unique set of criteria for
every project. Our organisation has been built around the philosophy of
devising simple solutions designed to fit most buildings without
bespoke engineering, ensuring compliance with Building Regulations
without the need for dispensations or negotiation with approving
authorities, thus taking away the risk associated with fire engineered
solutions.
Our most popular solution is the natural ventilation
option as opposed to a pressurisation system as there can be up to a
50% reduction in cost, it takes less time to specify the system and
there are less ongoing maintenance requirements. Our UniVent product
has been developed to ventilate common escape routes in buildings. It
is a modular system designed to meet 99% of apartment development
requirements and has been independently assessed and granted Local
Authority Building Control Type Approval. This ensures compliance with
the Building Regulations and a fast track through the building
regulation approval procedure is assured.
The system works by
detecting smoke which triggers an automatic lobby ventilator to vent
the smoke into the chimney. The vent at the head of the chimney also
opens to release the smoke into the atmosphere.
We recently
installed such a solution at Synergy, a Bellway Homes development at
Park 25 on the outskirts of Redhill, Surrey. The development includes
seven apartment blocks and the UniVent system was the preferred
solution thanks to Local Authority Building Control Type Approval. This
meant the developer faced no delays, and its modular design meant
installation could be completed quickly and to schedule.
When
thinking about smoke control systems it is essential to remember the
crucial role they play in reducing risk to life and property in the
unfortunate event of a fire. Despite their obvious benefits these
systems are too often seen as surplus to requirements and an
unnecessary headache in the building design process.
Only when
the industry begins to recognise the value of promoting straightforward
solutions designed to comply with building regulations simply and
efficiently can we enhance perceptions of the value and use of smoke
control systems both within the construction industry and beyond.
Formed
in 1992 and based near Cardiff in south Wales, Smoke Control Services
specialises in smoke control systems for multi-occupancy residential
buildings and other applications. SCS has built a strong reputation for
technical excellence, innovation and quality.























